Digital Borders and Virtual Walls: Legal Responses to Online Migration Control

Authors

    Mariana Figueiroa Faculty of Law, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
    Salma Benyoussef * Department of Political Science, Hassan II University, Casablanca, Morocco salma.benyoussef@uh2c.ma

Keywords:

Digital borders, virtual walls, migration governance, algorithmic decision-making, biometric surveillance, data protection, legal accountability

Abstract

This study aims to examine how legal frameworks have responded to the emergence of digital borders and virtual walls in the context of contemporary migration control. This study utilized a scientific narrative review approach combined with a descriptive analysis method to synthesize literature published between 2021 and 2024. Sources included academic journal articles, legal documents, international guidelines, and policy reports focused on algorithmic governance, biometric surveillance, data sharing, and extraterritorial border control. The review analyzed national, regional, and international legal instruments and case law to assess how current legal responses address the challenges posed by digital technologies in migration governance. The study identified four major dimensions of digital migration control: algorithmic decision-making in immigration procedures, biometric and surveillance technologies at borders, data collection and profiling, and virtual geofencing and border externalization. Each dimension introduces legal concerns related to transparency, consent, privacy, due process, and accountability. While some legal responses exist—such as data protection regulations and human rights treaties—they are often fragmented, limited in scope, and inadequately enforced. The findings reveal significant gaps in legal protection, particularly for migrants who are subject to decisions made by opaque digital systems and transnational data infrastructures. Digital technologies have fundamentally reshaped the mechanisms of migration control, yet legal systems have struggled to keep pace with their rapid deployment. Existing frameworks are insufficient to ensure transparency, fairness, and accountability in the digital governance of mobility. A comprehensive and coordinated legal response is urgently needed to safeguard migrants’ rights in the digital age.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Calamlam, J. M. M., Ferran, F. M., & Macabali, L. G. (2021). Perception on Research Methods Course’s Online Environment and Self-Regulated Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic. E-Learning and Digital Media, 19(1), 93-119. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530211027722

Chen, L., Yan, J., Zhang, H., Xu, J., & Chen, X. (2022). CircSTAM Inhibits Migration and Invasion of Trophoblast Cells by Regulating miR-148a-5p/PTEN Axis. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 40(1), 201-210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-022-02660-4

Cronin, K., Dally, J., & Neale, C. (2024). Child Migration: Family and Immigration Laws. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781526502230

Dingoyan, D., Metzner, F., Kongur, A., Arslan, Ö., Pust, G. E. A., & Weierstall‐Pust, R. (2022). The Impact of Perceived Discrimination on Cultural Identification, Psychological Stress, Emotion Regulation and Aggressive Tendencies in Individuals With Turkish Migration Background in Germany. Frontiers in Sociology, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2022.705027

Du, W., Nair, P. R., Johnston, A., Wu, P. H., & Wirtz, D. (2022). Cell Trafficking at the Intersection of the Tumor–Immune Compartments. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 24(1), 275-305. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-110320-110749

Kalantari, S., Put, A., & Decker, B. D. (2021). Trackers in Your Inbox: Criticizing Current Email Tracking Practices. 156-167. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76663-4_9

Lan, L., Cao, H., Zhao, L., Cui, W., & Wang, B. (2023). PTPN12 Down-Regulated by miR-146b-3p Gene Affects the Malignant Progression of Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Open Medicine, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/med-2023-0727

Martirosyan, D. G. (2022). Legal Labor Migration Regulation From Third Countries Under European Union Law. Scientific Review Series 1 Economics and Law(1), 121-131. https://doi.org/10.26653/2076-4650-2022-1-09

Ren, Y. (2023). Analysis on the Accounting Problems of Incentive Policies for Online Sales Based on the New Revenue Standard—Taking Bear Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. As an Example. Accounting Auditing and Finance, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.23977/accaf.2023.040205

Sagala, G. H., Hasibuan, A. F., & Suharianto, J. (2021). Readiness to Implement Digital Learning. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.210616.050

Xiao, J., Xiao, Q., Luo, T. Y., & Zhong, H. (2024). What Happens After “Nora Leaves Home”? Chinese Female Rural-to-Urban Migrants in the Sex Webcamming Industry. Feminist Criminology. https://doi.org/10.1177/15570851241297655

Xue, J., Xu, X., Wu, Y., & Hu, P. (2023). Student Perceptions of the Community of Inquiry Framework and Satisfaction: Examining the Role of Academic Emotion and Self-Regulation in a Structural Model. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1046737

Yuan, D., Chen, J., Hao, Q., Zhang, P., & Chen, Z. (2022). Methyltransferase-Like 3 Aggravates HCC Development via Mediating N6-Methyladenosine of Ubiquitin-Specific Protease 7. Journal of Oncology, 2022, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6167832

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2026-01-01

Submitted

2025-07-22

Revised

2025-12-15

Accepted

2025-12-22

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Figueiroa, M., & Benyoussef, S. (2026). Digital Borders and Virtual Walls: Legal Responses to Online Migration Control. Interdisciplinary Studies in Society, Law, and Politics, 5(1), 1-9. https://journalisslp.com/index.php/isslp/article/view/458

Similar Articles

1-10 of 277

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.