Cross-Border Data Flows and Digital Sovereignty: Legal Dilemmas in Transnational Governance

Authors

    Mehmet Kaya * Department of International Relations, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkiye mehmet.kaya@istanbul.edu.tr
    Hamza Shahid Department of Law, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan
https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.isslp.4.2.20

Keywords:

cross-border data flows, digital sovereignty, data localization, legal fragmentation, transnational governance, interoperability, data protection

Abstract

This article aims to explore the legal dilemmas arising from the intersection of cross-border data flows and digital sovereignty within the evolving landscape of transnational governance. Using a narrative review approach and a descriptive analysis method, this study synthesizes recent academic literature, international legal instruments, regional regulations, and national policies published between 2020 and 2024. The sources include peer-reviewed legal scholarship, policy documents from international organizations, and national legislative texts. The analysis focuses on the conceptual foundations of cross-border data movement and digital sovereignty, the legal frameworks governing data governance, and the challenges of harmonizing national interests with global connectivity. The study draws upon legal theory and comparative regulatory analysis to critically examine multilateral initiatives and national responses. The study finds that cross-border data flows are essential to digital trade, innovation, and global interconnectivity, yet they increasingly face legal constraints due to states’ pursuit of digital sovereignty. This pursuit manifests in data localization laws, extraterritorial enforcement of domestic regulations, and strategic decoupling efforts, particularly among major geopolitical actors. International and regional efforts at harmonization—such as those by the OECD and G20—offer frameworks for trust-based data governance but remain hindered by divergent regulatory philosophies. Fragmentation of legal norms has resulted in significant compliance challenges and enforcement dilemmas, while human rights protections in data governance vary widely across jurisdictions, affecting privacy and freedom of expression. Effective governance of cross-border data flows requires a balance between national sovereignty and transnational cooperation. Moving forward, interoperability and mutual legal recognition offer viable alternatives to legal uniformity or isolation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmed, A. (2021). Transnational Legal Orders and Global Health. 203-216. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197547410.013.9

An, Y. (2022). Study on the Legal Regulation of Multinational Corporations on Environmental Human Rights. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.220603.066

Canfield, M. (2021). Transnational Food Law. 269-290. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197547410.013.12

Canfield, M. (2023). The Anthropology of Legal Form: Ethnographic Contributions to the Study of Transnational Law. Law & Social Inquiry, 48(1), 31-47. https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2022.19

Crowley, K., Stewart, J., Kay, A., & Head, B. (2020). Reconsidering Borders. 75-96. https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781447333111.003.0005

Du, Z. (2022). Human Rights Violations by Multinational Corporations and the Outlet to Judical Difficulties. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.220603.108

Duval, A. (2022). Taking Feminism Beyond the State: FIFA as a Transnational Battleground for Feminist Legal Critique. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 20(1), 277-298. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moac019

Feng, C. J. (2023). The Human Rights Obligations of Multinational Corporations and Their Regulation. Highlights in Business Economics and Management, 16, 394-400. https://doi.org/10.54097/hbem.v16i.10605

Ghadery, F. (2021). Contextualization as a (Feminist) Method for Transnational Legal Practice. 707-726. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197547410.013.32

Goode, R. (2023). Transnational Commercial Law and Impediments to Its Development. 319-336. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198889762.003.0019

Haagensen, N. (2023). Legal Strategies at the Governance Precipice: Transnational Lawyers in the European Union’s Sovereign Debt Crisis (2010–2012). Law & Social Inquiry, 49(3), 1715-1746. https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2023.67

Jiang, A., Zong, W., & Shi, Q. (2022). Cooperation Between China and ASEAN in Combating Wildlife Trade Under the Framework of Regional Legal System. Asia Social Science Academy, 9(1), 75-94. https://doi.org/10.51600/jass.2022.9.1.75

Joerges, C. (2023). Transnational Constitutionalism – Conflicts‐law Constitutionalism – Economic Constitutionalism: The Exemplary Case of the European Union. Journal of Law and Society, 50(S1). https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12438

Kotiswaran, P., & Palmer, N. (2021). Transnational Criminal Law: A Field in the Making. 179-202. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197547410.013.8

Leonelli, G. C. (2021). The Postmodern Normative Anxiety of Transnational Legal Studies. 113-132. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197547410.013.5

Lilipaly, N. F., Tuhulele, P., & Daties, D. R. A. (2023). Pertanggungjawaban Pelaku Penyelundupan Migran Lintas Negara Ditinjau Dari Hukum Internasional. Tatohi Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 3(7), 651. https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v3i7.1850

Liu, D. (2024). Borderline Content and Platformised Speech Governance: Mapping TikTok's Moderation Controversies in South and Southeast Asia. Policy & Internet, 16(3), 543-566. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.388

Mahardika, A. G. (2022). Politik Hukum Dalam Penanganan Covid-19: Pendekatan Yuridis Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia. Yurispruden Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang, 5(2), 211. https://doi.org/10.33474/yur.v5i2.9005

Marco, A. D. (2021). Sports Economy and Fight Against Corruption: Which Limits to the Sporting Organisations Autonomy? European Business Law Review, 32(Issue 5), 877-904. https://doi.org/10.54648/eulr2021031

Minas, S. (2021). Transnational Legal Education in China. 1137-1152. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197547410.013.52

Perez, O. (2022). Transnational Networked Authority. Leiden Journal of International Law, 35(2), 265-293. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0922156521000728

Sarcar, A. (2024). Circumventing the Nation: How to Develop a Postcolonial Archive on Public Health in India. Revue Internationale Des Études Du Développement, 256, 203-226. https://doi.org/10.4000/131ll

Sourgens, F. G., Baldwin, E., & Banet, C. (2024). The Transnational Law of Renewable Energy. https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198894520.001.0001

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2025-04-01

Submitted

2025-01-29

Revised

2025-03-22

Accepted

2025-03-28

How to Cite

Kaya, M., & Shahid, H. (2025). Cross-Border Data Flows and Digital Sovereignty: Legal Dilemmas in Transnational Governance. Interdisciplinary Studies in Society, Law, and Politics, 4(2), 219-233. https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.isslp.4.2.20

Similar Articles

1-10 of 167

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.