Weaponizing Historical Memory: Legal Battles Over Statues, Monuments, and Collective Trauma

Authors

    Eleni Papadopoulou Department of Political Science, University of Piraeus, Piraeus, Greece
    Andrew De Smet * Department of Law, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium Andrew.desmet@kuleuven.be

Keywords:

Monuments, Collective Memory, Legal Controversy, Cultural Trauma, Public Protest, Memory Activism, Symbolic Justice

Abstract

This study aims to explore how historical memory is weaponized through legal and societal conflicts over statues and monuments, with a focus on their role in collective trauma, identity, and symbolic justice. This article employs a scientific narrative review approach using a descriptive analysis method to synthesize interdisciplinary literature from 2019 to 2024 across memory studies, trauma theory, legal scholarship, and cultural anthropology. Relevant case studies, legal rulings, scholarly articles, and theoretical frameworks were selected through systematic searches of academic databases. The analysis focuses on comparative historical contexts, key legal controversies, psychological effects, and activist responses related to monuments in the United States, the United Kingdom, South Africa, Eastern Europe, France, and Belgium. The findings reveal that monuments act as contested sites of public memory and instruments of political power, capable of both reflecting and suppressing collective trauma. Legal disputes over their removal or preservation often involve conflicting principles such as cultural heritage protection, freedom of expression, and democratic representation. Statues connected to colonialism, slavery, or totalitarian regimes frequently provoke public protest and judicial challenges, exposing deep societal divides. The presence of oppressive symbols in public spaces contributes to psychological distress and intergenerational trauma among marginalized groups, while their removal can serve as a form of symbolic justice. In parallel, emerging practices such as counter-monuments and memory activism offer alternative strategies for reckoning with the past. Statues and monuments are not neutral artifacts but dynamic symbols that influence how societies remember and negotiate historical trauma. Their legal and cultural contestation underscores broader struggles over identity, justice, and collective healing, making public commemoration a critical site for ethical and political transformation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AriboĞAn, D. Ü. (2021). The Case of Hagia Sophia's Opening to Worship as an Example of Political “Anamnesis”. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, 0(63), 39-53. https://doi.org/10.26650/jecs2020-0089

Čerče, D. (2024). “People Don’t Like to Be Conquered, and So They Will Not Be”. Acta Neophilologica, 57(2), 29-44. https://doi.org/10.4312/an.57.2.29-44

Erokhina, E. A. (2020). Sacralization of Heritage in Neotraditional Practices of South Siberia Turkic Peoples. Ethnography of Altai and Adjacent Territories, 10, 94-97. https://doi.org/10.37386/2687-0592-2020-10-94-97

Eyerman, R. (2019). Cultural Trauma, Collective Memory, and the Vietnam War. 143-165. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13507-2_7

Fekete, I. (2020). Unburied Bodies — Hungarian National Identity 1989‐2020. Australian Journal of Politics & History, 66(3), 415-431. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajph.12695

İlengiz, Ç. (2022). The Aesthetics of Open-Ended Mourning: The Statue of a Holy-Madman in Dersim, Turkey. Journal of Material Culture, 27(4), 396-413. https://doi.org/10.1177/13591835221132494

Koo, Y. j., & Yang, T. K. (2024). A Study on the Non-Material Characteristics of ‘Counter Monument' and Its Case. Korean Soc Cult Converg, 46(1), 729-745. https://doi.org/10.33645/cnc.2024.01.46.01.729

Laycock, J. P. (2020). The Day Satan Came to Oklahoma. 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190948498.003.0001

Leon, A. N. D., Woerner, J., Dvorak, R. D., Cox, J. M., Magri, T. D., Hayden, E., Ahuja, M., & Haeny, A. M. (2023). An Examination of Discrimination on Stress, Depression, and Oppression-Based Trauma During the COVID-19 Pandemic and the Racial Awakening of 2020. Chronic Stress, 7. https://doi.org/10.1177/24705470231152953

Mindiashvili, N., & Kutsia, N. (2021). Collective Trauma in Refugee Literature (Based on Almanacs – 14 Gigabytes and Halleluiah). International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science(4(32)). https://doi.org/10.31435/rsglobal_ijitss/30122021/7695

Nazaruddin, M., & Indah, L. S. (2021). Tsunami in the Collective Memory: A Reception Study of the Visitors of Tsunami Memorials in Aceh, Indonesia. Asian Journal of Media and Communication, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.20885/asjmc.vol5.iss1.art4

Prykhodko, N. (2024). Traumas of War and Cultural Identities: Visual Media in the Ukrainian Context. Bulletin of Mariupol State University Series Philosophy Culture Studies Sociology, 14(28), 109-118. https://doi.org/10.34079/2226-2830-2024-14-28-109-118

Řídký, J. (2023). „Mít Oči K Vidění I K Pláči“ Aneb Jak Tlumočit Bolest Minulosti. Auc Philosophica Et Historica, 2021(1), 251-259. https://doi.org/10.14712/24647055.2023.13

Sadowski, M. M., Rego, R. M., & Carmo, A. (2024). Memories of a Glorious or Difficult Past? Portugal, Padrão Dos Descobrimentos and the (Lack of A) 21st Century Reckoning. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale De Sémiotique Juridique. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-023-10088-x

Simko, C. (2019). Collective Memory. https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199756384-0215

Veh, K. v., & Raubenheimer, L. (2022). Memorials, Landscape and White Masculinity: Dialogic Interventions in South African Art. Image & Text(36), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.17159/2617-3255/2022/n36a17

Winterstein, B. (2021). The Case for Graphic Counter-Memorials in the Comics of Joe Sacco, Art Spiegelman, and Brian Wood and Riccardo Burchielli. https://doi.org/10.32920/ryerson.14660568

Zietlow, N. (2020). The Politics of Monumentalizing Trauma: Visual Use of Martyrdom in the Memorialization of the Iraq-Iran War. Review of Middle East Studies, 54(1), 131-132. https://doi.org/10.1017/rms.2020.11

Богатова, О. А., & Mitrofanova, A. V. (2020). Museification of the Traumatic Past in South Africa: Competing Narratives. Izvestiya of Altai State University(6(116)), 12-16. https://doi.org/10.14258/izvasu(2020)6-01

Рикев, К. (2022). Pomniki Armii Radzieckiej W Bułgarii Jako Instrument W Narodowej Debacie Nad Historyczną Pamięcią I Zapomnieniem. Kultura Słowian Rocznik Komisji Kultury Słowian Pau, 18, 67-80. https://doi.org/10.4467/25439561ksr.22.005.16357

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2026-01-01

Submitted

2025-07-25

Revised

2025-12-14

Accepted

2025-12-22

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Papadopoulou, E., & De Smet, A. (2026). Weaponizing Historical Memory: Legal Battles Over Statues, Monuments, and Collective Trauma. Interdisciplinary Studies in Society, Law, and Politics, 5(1), 1-14. https://journalisslp.com/index.php/isslp/article/view/465

Similar Articles

21-30 of 278

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.