Whistleblower Protections in the Age of National Security: A Legal Comparative Study

Authors

    Anna Müller Department of Political Science, Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    Youssef El Amrani * Department of International Relations, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco youssef.elamrani@um5.ac.ma
    Liam Patterson Department of Criminal Justice, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

Keywords:

Whistleblower protection, national security, comparative law, legal safeguards, democratic accountability, public interest disclosures, civil society, rule of law

Abstract

This study aims to examine and compare the legal protections available to whistleblowers in national security contexts across diverse legal systems. Using a scientific narrative review design and a descriptive analysis method, this article explores whistleblower protection frameworks in selected common law and civil law jurisdictions. Legal sources including statutory provisions, case law, and policy documents published between 2018 and 2024 were analyzed to assess the scope, effectiveness, and limitations of existing legal protections. Countries were selected to represent a range of legal traditions and national security climates, including the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, Germany, France, and South Korea. The review also considered the role of civil society and media in supporting whistleblower disclosures. The comparative analysis reveals significant disparities in how national legal systems address whistleblower protections related to national security. Common challenges include broad national security exemptions, ambiguous legal language, limited enforcement mechanisms, and procedural complexity. Even in jurisdictions with formal protection regimes, individuals disclosing classified information often face criminal prosecution or institutional retaliation. While some countries have made progress in aligning their domestic laws with international standards, national security disclosures remain a legal grey area. The presence of independent oversight bodies and supportive civil society actors contributes to more robust whistleblower frameworks, but these mechanisms are not uniformly available or effective. There is a critical need to harmonize national whistleblower protection laws with international human rights standards, particularly in the domain of national security. Legal reforms must address gaps in immunity, clarify reporting procedures, and ensure independent institutional oversight. Strengthening protections for national security whistleblowers is essential to promoting transparency, preventing abuse of power, and reinforcing democratic accountability on a global scale.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afrita, J. (2024). Effectiveness of Legal Protection for Whistleblowers in Corruption Cases in Indonesia. Istinbath Jurnal Hukum, 21(02). https://doi.org/10.32332/istinbath.v21i02.9821

Alshoubaki, W. e., & Harris, M. (2022). Striving for Protection: Whistleblowers in Jordan. Sage Open, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221095023

Amin, S., & Wicaksana, S. U. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Whistleblower Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia. Media of Law and Sharia, 3(3), 205-218. https://doi.org/10.18196/mls.v3i3.14468

Ananian-Welsh, R., Cronin, R., & Greste, P. (2021). In the Public Interest: Protections and Risks in Whistleblowing to the Media. University of New South Wales Law Journal, 44(4). https://doi.org/10.53637/wmzr2175

Awaludin, A. (2022). Mempidanakan Para Whistleblower Korupsi. LSJ, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.33650/lsj.v2i1.3332

Baciu, O. (2023). Whistleblowers - The Evolutionary Retrospective of the Institution in the National Legal Regulations. Supremacy of Law(1), 29-39. https://doi.org/10.52388/2345-1971.2023.1.03

Eberhardt, C. (2024). Das Neue Deutsche Whistleblowing-Recht. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748945734

Hariz, A. A., Nugroho, H., & Ridwan, R. (2024). Reconstruction of Legal Protection for Civil Servants as Whistleblowers in Eradicating Corruption Crimes in Indonesia. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 5(3), 1185-1226. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v5i3.16334

Kšenžighová, A., & Ušiaková, L. (2023). Ochrana Oznamovateľov Protispoločenskej Činnosti. 292-303. https://doi.org/10.24132/zcu.nadeje.2022.292-303

Leclerc, O. (2023). Overarmed or Underdressed? Whistleblowers Between Anti-Discrimination Law and Freedom of Expression. International Journal of Discrimination and the Law, 23(3), 265-282. https://doi.org/10.1177/13582291231154161

Lee, J. H., & Cho, H. (2022). Media Reports and Whistleblowing Disclosure. The Korea Association for Corruption Studies, 27(3), 111-130. https://doi.org/10.52663/kcsr.2022.27.3.111

Morávek, J., & Pichrt, J. (2021). Protection of Whistleblowers in Legal Order of the Czech Republic Within the Context of the Directive on the Protection of Whistleblowers for Persons Who Report on Violations of the European Union Law (2019/1937). Societas Et Iurisprudentia, 9(1), 38-55. https://doi.org/10.31262/1339-5467/2021/9/1/38-55

Patria, V. (2024). The Importance of Renewing the Whistle Blower Regulation for Corruption Crimes in Indonesia. JHCJ, 4(1), 18-30. https://doi.org/10.30588/jhcj.v4i1.1833

Primasari, D., Waspodo, L., & Ilhami, M. T. (2022). The Influence of Attitudes, Perception of Control and Internal Control System on Whistleblowing Intention With Legal Protection as a Moderation Variable (Study on PT Kereta API Indonesia). Buhalterinės Apskaitos Teorija Ir Praktika(26), 4. https://doi.org/10.15388/batp.2022.48

Rahmat, D., Hakim, L., & Prawiranegara, M. Z. P. (2024). A Model of Legal Protection for Justice Collaborators and Whistleblowers in Corruption Crimes. Jurnal Supremasi, 52-68. https://doi.org/10.35457/supremasi.v14i2.2800

Setiawan, G. N. A., Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi, D., & Widyantara, I. M. M. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Whistleblower Dalam Tindak Pidana Narkotika. Jurnal Preferensi Hukum, 2(2), 332-336. https://doi.org/10.22225/jph.2.2.3330.332-336

Slamkov, G., Stamevski, V., & Stamevska, E. (2022). “Challenges for Improving the Legal Framework for Protection of Whistblowers in the Macedonian Legislation”. International Scientific Journal Sui Generis, 1(2), 24-34. https://doi.org/10.55843/sg2212024s

Sulastri, L. (2023). The Legal Protection for Whistleblowers on Corruption Crimes in Indonesia. Jurnal Daulat Hukum, 6(3), 287. https://doi.org/10.30659/jdh.v6i3.31043

Ţop, D. C. (2023). Legal Protection of the Employee Who Report Violations of the Law. Revue Européenne Du Droit Social, 62(1), 7-13. https://doi.org/10.53373/reds.2023.62.1.0141

Wahid, A. (2022). The Urgency of Whistleblowers Legal Protection in the Criminal Justice System. Fiat Justisia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 16(4), 353-370. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v16no4.2660

Wolf, D., & Kosieradzka, K. (2024). Whistleblowers in the Insurance Sector. Prawo Asekuracyjne, 3(120), 17-35. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0054.8863

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2025-10-01

Submitted

2025-03-27

Revised

2025-04-29

Accepted

2025-05-11

How to Cite

Müller, A., El Amrani, Y., & Patterson, L. (2025). Whistleblower Protections in the Age of National Security: A Legal Comparative Study. Interdisciplinary Studies in Society, Law, and Politics, 4(4), 1-10. https://journalisslp.com/index.php/isslp/article/view/451

Similar Articles

1-10 of 296

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.