Analyzing the Interaction of Legal–Political Approaches by Scholars as a Novel Strategy for Strengthening International Peace and Security (A Descriptive–Analytical Study)
Keywords:
International peace and security, international law, international relations, elite approaches, interdisciplinary interactionAbstract
This paper examines how the synergistic interaction between international relations and international law contributes to the consolidation of global peace. The central question addressed is how scholars’ integration of power-oriented (political) and rule-based (legal) approaches can mitigate implementation gaps in the maintenance of international security. Employing a descriptive–analytical framework and relying on library-based data collection, the study analyzes key legal and political documents, doctrinal writings, and theoretical contributions by leading scholars in both fields. The analysis demonstrates that the separation of legal norms from political realities has frequently resulted in impasses in conflict resolution processes. Nevertheless, interdisciplinary scholarly efforts have generated conceptual frameworks that simultaneously enhance the legitimacy and effectiveness of international institutions. The findings indicate that the integration of legal and political approaches is not merely an academic preference but a strategic necessity. Through the co-creation of a shared scholarly discourse and its indirect influence on state practice, this interdisciplinary synergy functions as a significant catalyst for strengthening international peace and security.
Downloads
References
Ansari, V. (2015). Iranian Administrative Law. Mizan Publishing House.
Bass, G. J. (2000). Stay the Hand of Vengeance: The Politics of War Crimes Tribunals. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400851713
Bassiouni, M. C. (1996). Searching for Peace and Achieving Justice. Law and Contemporary Problems, 59. https://doi.org/10.2307/1192187
Boyle, A., & Chinkin, C. (2007). The Making of International Law. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199213795.003.0001
Cassese, A. (2013). Cassese's International Criminal Law. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780199694921.001.0001
Evans, G. (2008). The Responsibility to Protect: Ending Mass Atrocity Crimes Once and for All. Brookings Institution Press. https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Responsibility_to_Protect.html?id=Tj4IwhquNG4C
Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization, 52(4), 887-917. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550789
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Pantheon Books. https://books.google.com/books/about/Discipline_and_Punish.html?id=AVzuf-r22eoC
Franck, T. M. (1990). The Power of Legitimacy among Nations. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195061789.001.0001
Goldsmith, J. L., & Posner, E. A. (2005). The Limits of International Law. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195168396.001.0001
Haas, P. M. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300001442
Henckaerts, J. M., & Doswald-Beck, L. (2005). Customary International Humanitarian Law. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804700
Henkin, L. (1979). How Nations Behave: Law and Foreign Policy. Columbia University Press. https://books.google.com/books/about/How_Nations_Behave.html?id=84h47OGNklkC
Kelsen, H. (1942). Law and Peace in International Relations. Harvard University Press. https://books.google.com/books/about/Law_and_Peace_in_International_Relations.html?id=wu2VPwAACAAJ
Kelsen, H. (1944). Peace through Law. University of North Carolina Press. https://books.google.com/books?id=hjKnSkfogKYC&source=gbs_navlinks_s
Keohane, R. O. (1984). After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton University Press. https://books.google.com/books/about/After_Hegemony.html?id=HnvpdocqT9EC
Koh, H. H. (1997). Why Nations Obey. The Yale Law Journal, 106(8), 2599-2659. https://doi.org/10.2307/797228
Koskenniemi, M. (2005). From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511493713
Krasner, S. D. (1983). International Regimes. Cornell University Press. https://books.google.com/books/about/International_Regimes.html?hl=id&id=WIYKBNM5zagC
Lasswell, H. D., & McDougal, M. S. (1992). Jurisprudence for a Free Society: Studies in Law, Science and Policy. New Haven Press. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004534261
Montville, J. V. (1991). The Arrow and the Olive Branch; A Case for Track Two Diplomacy. In. Lexington Books. https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Arrow_and_the_Olive_Branch.html?id=E0AZzgEACAAJ
Morgenthau, H. J. (1948). Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. Alfred A. Knopf. https://books.google.com/books/about/Politics_Among_Nations.html?id=M9IlAAAAMAAJ
Reus-Smit, C. (2004). The Politics of International Law. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491641
Sassòli, M. (2019). International Humanitarian Law: Rules, Controversies, and Solutions to Problems Arising in Warfare. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://books.google.com/books/about/International_Humanitarian_Law.html?id=95GODwAAQBAJ
Schabas, W. A. (2017). An Introduction to the International Criminal Court. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316459997
Shapiro, M. M. (1981). Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226161341.001.0001
Shaw, M. N. (2017). International Law. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316979815
Sikkink, K. (2011). The Justice Cascade: How Human Rights Prosecutions Are Changing World Politics. W. W. Norton & Company. https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Justice_Cascade.html?id=EmLkNTdh-PkC
Slaughter, A.-M. (2004). A New World Order. Princeton University Press. https://books.google.com/books?id=WzG5qJM0AekC&source=gbs_navlinks_s
Stahn, C. (2007). "Jus post bellum": Mapping the Discipline(s). American Journal of International Law, 101(4), 921-948. https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1022&context=auilr
Stone Sweet, A. (2000). Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198297718.001.0001
Tannenwald, N. (2007). The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and the Non-Use of Nuclear Weapons since 1945. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491726
United Nations. (1945). Charter of the United Nations and Statute of the International Court of Justice. https://treaties.un.org/doc/publication/ctc/uncharter.pdf
Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of International Politics. McGraw-Hill. https://books.google.com/books/about/Theory_of_International_Politics.html?id=Z17uAAAAMAAJ
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. University of California Press. https://books.google.com/books/about/Economy_and_Society.html?id=pSdaNuIaUUEC
Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what States make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization, 46(2). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027764
Yousefi Jooybari, M., & Khorshidi, N. (2018). The Dialectic of Law and Politics in the Approach of the English School of International Relations. International Relations Quarterly. https://jpq.ut.ac.ir/article_66427.html
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rasool Yousefi (Author); Seyed Farshid Jafari Pabandi (Corresponding author); Malek Zolqadr (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
