A Critical Analysis of Imamiyyah Jurisprudence and Iranian Law Regarding the Exploitation of Groundwater with Emphasis on Environmental Obligations and the Principle of La-Zarar

Authors

    Atieh Araghi Department of History, CT.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
    Mohammad Sepehri * Department of History, CT.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. 6529705805@iau.ir
    Sayed Abolfazl Razavi Department of History, Faculty of Humanities, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.

Keywords:

Imamiyyah jurisprudence, Iranian law, groundwater, principle of la-zarar, environmental obligations, environmental justice

Abstract

The excessive exploitation of groundwater in recent decades has become one of the fundamental environmental and legal challenges in Iran. This issue, beyond threatening vital resources and destroying ecosystems, has created a profound conflict between individual interests and public welfare. The present study, through a critical and comparative approach, examines the foundations of Imamiyyah (Shiʿi) jurisprudence and the Iranian legal system concerning the exploitation of groundwater, seeking to clarify their relationship with environmental obligations and the principle of la-zarar (no harm). The findings indicate that in Imamiyyah jurisprudence, the principle of ownership and dominion (tasallut) over one’s property is restricted by the rule of la-zarar and the consideration of public interest; therefore, it cannot serve as justification for harming shared resources or the environment. On the other hand, although Iranian legal documents and higher-order policies emphasize the protection of natural resources and sustainable development, their implementation suffers from structural weaknesses and conflicts between private rights and public interests. Consequently, to achieve environmental justice and prevent public harm, it is necessary to reinterpret and institutionalize the jurisprudential foundations of the la-zarar rule alongside the principles of environmental law in the country’s water management policies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amini, N., & Razania, M. (2018). The Deficiencies and Deviations of Basra Exegesis in the First Two Islamic Centuries. Seraj-e Monir(33), 105-132.

Daftary, F. (1990). The Ismā'īlīs: Their History and Doctrines. Cambridge University Press.

Gorji, A. Q. (1996). Justification for Independent Legal Reasoning. In Encyclopaedia of the World of Islam (Vol. 1). Encyclopaedia Islamica.

Hallaq, W. B. (2005). The Origins and Evolution of Islamic Law. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511818783

Hitti, P. K. (2002). History of the Arabs. Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-03982-8

Ibn Athir, I. (2004). The Complete History (Vol. 3). Asatir.

Ibn Ḥajar al-ʿAsqalānī, A. b. ʿ. (1971). The Tongue of the Balance (Vol. 2; 4). Mu'assasat al-A'lami lil-Maṭbūʿāt.

Ibn Nadīm, M. The Index (Edited by R. Tajaddod ed.).

Kennedy, H. (2001). The Prophet and the Age of the Caliphates: The Islamic Near East from the Sixth to the Eleventh Century. Longman.

Khateeb Baghdadi, A. B. A. The History of Baghdad and the City of Peace (Vol. 10). Dar al-Fikr.

Krawietz, B. (2002). Authority and Political Culture in Shi'i Islam. Routledge.

Miftakhri, H., & Koushki, F. (2020). Readers and Their Role in the Transformations of the First Islamic Century. History of Islam(22), 45-50.

Motzki, H. (2002). Hadith and the Origins of Islamic Jurisprudence. Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004491533

Mousavi-Tinyani, S. A. (2017). The Hadithic Movement of the Imamiyya in Basra (Era of Presence). Hadith Sciences(84), 102-127.

Mousavi Tenyani, S. A. (2018). The Historical Current of Imami Historians in Basra from the Beginning until the Mid-Fourth Century AH. History of Islam(73), 67-98.

Paktchi, A. (2020). Jurisprudence in Basra. In Encyclopaedia Islamica.

Qasempour, M. A Study of the Current of Mystical Exegesis.

Qasempour, M. (2014). Ḥammād ibn Zayd in the Struggle. In The Great Islamic Encyclopedia (Vol. 14). Center for the Great Islamic Encyclopedia.

Qureshi, S. H. (2005). Three Iranian Companions of Imam Baqir. Farhang-e Kosar(62), 126-129.

Rostami, A. (2009). The Influence of Political Currents on Exegesis and Commentators. Boostan Ketab.

Sachedina, A. (1981). The Just Ruler in Shī'ī Islam: The Comprehensive Authority of the Jurist in Imamite Jurisprudence. SUNY Press.

Sellheim, R. (2016). Persian Influence on Arabic Literature in Early Islamic Basra. Harrassowitz.

Sijistani, S. b. A. (1989). Sunan Abi Dawud (Vol. 1). Dar al-Fikr.

Tabari, M. b. J. (1996). The History of Al-Tabari (Vol. 4). Asatir.

Tusi, M. b. H. (1996). Rijāl (Edited by J. al-Qayūmī ed.). Mo'asseseh al-Nashr al-Islāmī.

Ya'qūbī, A. b. A. Y. (2003). The History of Ya'qūbī (Translated by M. I. Āyati ed., Vol. 2). Elmi va Farhangi.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2026-09-01

Submitted

2025-07-03

Revised

2025-11-23

Accepted

2025-11-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Araghi, A. ., Sepehri, M., & Razavi, S. A. . (2026). A Critical Analysis of Imamiyyah Jurisprudence and Iranian Law Regarding the Exploitation of Groundwater with Emphasis on Environmental Obligations and the Principle of La-Zarar. Interdisciplinary Studies in Society, Law, and Politics. https://journalisslp.com/index.php/isslp/article/view/411

Similar Articles

81-90 of 263

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.