Regulating Hate Speech in Polarized Democracies: Legal Limits and Political Backlash
Keywords:
hate speech, polarization, democracy, freedom of expression, legal regulation, political backlash, comparative analysisAbstract
This study aims to explore the legal and political complexities of regulating hate speech in polarized democracies and to assess the implications of such regulation for democratic stability and freedom of expression. This article employs a scientific narrative review using a descriptive analysis method. Relevant academic publications, legal frameworks, international human rights documents, and judicial interpretations from 2020 to 2024 were systematically examined. The analysis focused on selected democratic countries, including the United States, Germany, India, and Brazil, to compare legal approaches, assess enforcement practices, and explore sociopolitical consequences. Sources were selected through targeted keyword searches across academic databases and legal repositories. The analysis reveals that legal responses to hate speech vary significantly across jurisdictions, influenced by historical, cultural, and constitutional factors. In countries with strong protections for free speech, such as the United States, hate speech laws are minimal and often controversial, while nations like Germany enforce robust restrictions based on principles of human dignity. In India and Brazil, enforcement is often inconsistent and shaped by prevailing political agendas, raising concerns about selective application and suppression of dissent. The review highlights that while legal sanctions can deter harmful expression, their effectiveness is limited without complementary strategies such as education, counter-speech, and public engagement. Political backlash, including accusations of censorship and mobilization of extremist groups, frequently follows attempts to regulate speech, especially in highly polarized contexts. Hate speech regulation in polarized democracies must balance legal rigor with contextual sensitivity. A combination of fair legal enforcement and non-legal interventions is essential to safeguarding democratic norms without compromising civil liberties.
Downloads
References
Akbarova, L. (2023). Hate Speech - Legal, Political, Cultural Aspects. World Experience in Legal Regulation. Distance Education in Ukraine Innovative Normative-Legal Pedagogical Aspects(2), 22-44. https://doi.org/10.18372/2786-5495.1.17303
Ayansola, A. O. (2021). A Study of Pragmatic Acts and Hate Speech Strategies in Christian Sermons in Nigeria. Ghana Journal of Linguistics, 10(2), 203-220. https://doi.org/10.4314/gjl.v10i2.9
Aydın, D. (2023). An Overview of Criminal Provisions Responding to Hate Speech in Turkish Law. Journal of Legal Studies, 32(46), 116-124. https://doi.org/10.2478/jles-2023-0015
Citra, A., Novitasari, D., Jamilah, S., & Sari, R. P. (2023). Analisis Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Kasus Ujaran Kebencian Di Media Sosial Berdasarkan Hukum Positif Di Indonesia. Visa Journal of Vision and Ideas, 3(3), 1092-1102. https://doi.org/10.47467/visa.v3i3.5710
Demczuk, A. (2021). The Discriminatory Legalism Strategy and Hate Speech Cases in Poland. The Role of the Commissioner for Human Rights in Fighting Discrimination. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska Sectio K – Politologia, 27(2), 127. https://doi.org/10.17951/k.2020.27.2.127-148
Fretes, D. R. D., Zainuddin, A., Darmawati, D., Muhammadong, M., & Dewi, P. M. (2023). Challenges in Enforcing Hate Speech Laws in Indonesian Politics. International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Business (Injoss), 2(3), 418-442. https://doi.org/10.54443/injoss.v2i3.89
Habrat, D. (2021). Protection of Human Dignity as a Basis for Penalization of Hate Speech Against People With Disabilities in Polish Criminal Law. Studia Iuridica Lublinensia, 30(4), 259. https://doi.org/10.17951/sil.2021.30.4.259-279
M.S, S., & Tomer, A. (2021). Hate Speech Against Disabled Persons: A Forensic Analysis of Legal Framework in India and Beyond. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, 16(1), 120-125. https://doi.org/10.37506/ijfmt.v16i1.17428
McHangama, J., & Alkiviadou, N. (2021). Hate Speech and the European Court of Human Rights: Whatever Happened to the Right to Offend, Shock or Disturb? Human Rights Law Review, 21(4), 1008-1042. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngab015
Muslim, S., & Solapari, N. (2024). The Impact of Hate Speech Regulations on Freedom of Expression an Indonesian Legal Perspective. The Easta Journal Law and Human Rights, 3(01), 10-19. https://doi.org/10.58812/eslhr.v3i01.352
Perry, B., Akca, D., Karakus, F., & Bastug, M. F. (2020). Planting Hate Speech to Harvest Hatred: How Does Political Hate Speech Fuel Hate Crimes in Turkey? International Journal for Crime Justice and Social Democracy, 9(4), 195-211. https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.v9i4.1514
Sánchez‐Holgado, P., Calderón, C. A., & Barbosa, M. (2023). Hate Speech and Polarization Around the “Trans Law” in Spain. Politics and Governance, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i2.6374
Schmid, U. K., Obermaier, M., & Rieger, D. (2024). Who Cares? How Personal Political Characteristics Are Related to Online Counteractions Against Hate Speech. Human Communication Research, 50(3), 393-403. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqae004
Stevanović, A. (2023). Analysing the Hate Speech Within the Framework of Political Discourse. Zbornik Instituta Za Kriminološka I Sociološka Istraživanja, XLII(1), 63-80. https://doi.org/10.47152/ziksi2023014
Swe, E. T. (2020). Hate Speech in Myanmar. Journal of Advanced Research in Social Sciences, 3(4), 31-37. https://doi.org/10.33422/jarss.v3i4.533
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Submitted
Revised
Accepted
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
