<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ArticleSet>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>KMAN Publication Incorporation</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Interdisciplinary Studies in Society, Law, and Politics</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>3060-5687</Issn>
      <Volume>5</Volume>
      <Issue>Serial Number 17</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2026</Year>
        <Month>04</Month>
        <Day>01</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>An Analysis of Iran’s Criminal Policy in Confronting the Misappropriation of Public Property by Government Employees</ArticleTitle>
    <VernacularTitle>An Analysis of Iran’s Criminal Policy in Confronting the Misappropriation of Public Property by Government Employees</VernacularTitle>
    <FirstPage>1</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>8</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2025</Year>
        <Month>07</Month>
        <Day>10</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <Abstract>&lt;p&gt;Administrative and financial corruption—particularly the misappropriation of public property by government employees—is a complex phenomenon with destructive economic and social consequences that undermines public trust. This article aims to examine Iran’s criminal policy regarding this criminal phenomenon by analyzing its legislative, judicial, executive, and participatory dimensions and developments. The research method is descriptive–analytical and based on legal documents and sources. The findings indicate that although Iran’s criminal policy has evolved and developed over time, it has predominantly followed a punitive and criminal-justice-oriented approach. However, more recent legislation has increasingly incorporated preventive and non-penal strategies. While identifying the strengths and weaknesses of the current policy, the study offers recommendations such as drafting comprehensive legislation, strengthening internal oversight mechanisms (with an emphasis on the role of e-government), and enhancing the participation of civil society organizations and the media to improve the overall effectiveness of this policy.&lt;/p&gt;</Abstract>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Criminal policy</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Misappropriation by government employees</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Public property</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Administrative corruption </Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Criminology</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
    <ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://journalisslp.com/index.php/isslp/article/download/408/787</ArchiveCopySource>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>
