<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ArticleSet>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>KMAN Publication Incorporation</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Interdisciplinary Studies in Society, Law, and Politics</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>3060-5687</Issn>
      <Volume>4</Volume>
      <Issue>Serial Number 13</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2025</Year>
        <Month>04</Month>
        <Day>01</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>Smart Contracts and Legal Enforceability: Decoding the Political Philosophy of Code as Law</ArticleTitle>
    <VernacularTitle>Smart Contracts and Legal Enforceability: Decoding the Political Philosophy of Code as Law</VernacularTitle>
    <FirstPage>292</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>302</LastPage>
    <ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.61838/kman.isslp.4.2.25</ELocationID>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2025</Year>
        <Month>02</Month>
        <Day>12</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <Abstract>&lt;p&gt;To explore the legal and philosophical implications of smart contracts, with a focus on their enforceability and the political significance of the “code as law” paradigm. This study adopts a narrative review approach using a descriptive analytical method to examine the intersection of law, technology, and political theory. Sources were selected from academic databases published between 2020 and 2024, encompassing legal scholarship, computer science literature, and political philosophy. Thematic analysis was used to synthesize key ideas related to legal enforceability, algorithmic governance, and the transformation of legal subjectivity in coded systems. The review highlights significant tensions between traditional legal norms and the deterministic nature of smart contracts. While smart contracts offer advantages in terms of automation and efficiency, they also lack the capacity to address ambiguity, context, and moral judgment. These contracts challenge core principles of legal theory, including consent, due process, and equitable remedies. Jurisdictions differ in their responses, ranging from proactive legal recognition to cautious regulatory experimentation. Hybrid models of enforcement and reliance on oracles demonstrate emerging attempts to bridge the gap between code and law. Smart contracts represent a disruptive force in the legal domain, necessitating critical reflection on the philosophical and institutional foundations of modern legal systems. Their adoption must be guided by a commitment to justice, democratic governance, and interdisciplinary oversight to ensure that legal innovation aligns with human values and ethical responsibility.&lt;/p&gt;</Abstract>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Smart contracts</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">legal enforceability</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">code as law</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">digital sovereignty</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">algorithmic governance</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">political philosophy</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">legal theory</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">rule of law</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">blockchain regulation</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
    <ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://journalisslp.com/index.php/isslp/article/download/321/538</ArchiveCopySource>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>
