<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ArticleSet>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>KMAN Publication Incorporation</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Interdisciplinary Studies in Society, Law, and Politics</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>3060-5687</Issn>
      <Volume>4</Volume>
      <Issue>Serial Number 12</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2025</Year>
        <Month>01</Month>
        <Day>01</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>From Expropriation to Compensation: Legal Remedies for Indigenous  Land Grievances</ArticleTitle>
    <VernacularTitle>From Expropriation to Compensation: Legal Remedies for Indigenous  Land Grievances</VernacularTitle>
    <FirstPage>208</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>219</LastPage>
    <ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.61838/kman.isslp.4.1.21</ELocationID>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName></FirstName>
        <LastName></LastName>
        <Affiliation></Affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2024</Year>
        <Month>10</Month>
        <Day>09</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <Abstract>&lt;p&gt;This article aims to critically examine the legal remedies available for addressing Indigenous land grievances across&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;various jurisdictions, focusing on restitution, compensation, recognition, and procedural mechanisms. Using a&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;scientific narrative review approach and descriptive analysis method, this study reviewed peer-reviewed academic&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;literature, legal texts, court rulings, and international instruments published between 2019 and 2024. Sources were&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;selected based on relevance to Indigenous land rights and included case law from Canada, Australia, the United States,&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;Brazil, and New Zealand. The analysis identified patterns and challenges in the legal treatment of Indigenous claims&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;and evaluated the effectiveness of different forms of remedy. The findings reveal that while legal systems have&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;increasingly recognized Indigenous land rights, significant limitations remain in the design and implementation of&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;remedies. Restitution is often obstructed by evidentiary and political barriers, compensation is frequently perceived&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;as inadequate, and legal recognition is constrained by regulatory limitations. Procedural access to justice is hindered&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;by cost, jurisdictional fragmentation, and lack of enforcement. Across jurisdictions, legal remedies tend to reflect&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;state-centered frameworks rather than Indigenous worldviews, leading to widespread dissatisfaction and demands&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;for transformative reform. Although notable progress has been made in the recognition of Indigenous land rights,&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;current legal remedies often fall short of addressing the historical and cultural dimensions of dispossession.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;Achieving meaningful land justice requires rethinking legal paradigms to center Indigenous epistemologies and&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;governance systems, supported by enforceable, inclusive, and context-sensitive remedies.&lt;/p&gt;</Abstract>
    <ObjectList>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">Indigenous land rights</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">legal remedies</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">restitution</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">compensation</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">recognition</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">procedural justice</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">land grievances</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">state sovereignty</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">customary law</Param>
      </Object>
      <Object Type="keyword">
        <Param Name="value">legal pluralism</Param>
      </Object>
    </ObjectList>
    <ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://journalisslp.com/index.php/isslp/article/download/306/510</ArchiveCopySource>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>
